<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AmmoSeek News &#187; 2nd Amendment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ammoseek.com/tag/2nd-amendment/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ammoseek.com</link>
	<description>Get some ammo and shoot it!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 00:09:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The NRA makes a deal with the devil</title>
		<link>http://blog.ammoseek.com/06152010/the-nra-makes-a-deal-with-the-devil/27</link>
		<comments>http://blog.ammoseek.com/06152010/the-nra-makes-a-deal-with-the-devil/27#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 20:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2nd Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nra]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ammoseek.com/?p=27</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While I am a gun owner and a strong proponent of second amendment rights, I&#8217;ve never been too fond of the National Rifle Association.  They aren&#8217;t all bad, but I am seriously turned off when they make compromises with our rights, the latest of which is a doozy.  It appears that the NRA has made [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I am a gun owner and a strong proponent of second amendment  rights, I&#8217;ve never been too fond of the National Rifle Association.   They aren&#8217;t all bad, but I am seriously turned off when they make  compromises with our rights, the latest of which is a doozy.  It appears  that the NRA has made a deal with Nancy Pelosi and other House  Democrats, signing away our first amendment rights.  In return, they  (not we) get an exemption from the draconian regulations.</p>
<blockquote><p>
<b>‘Shotgun Sellout’: House Democrats cut special  deal with NRA</b><br />
<em>House Democrats held a shotgun wedding between campaign finance   &#8220;reformers&#8221; and the National Rifle Association today in announcing a   carve out for the powerful gun lobby in a bill responding to the Supreme   Court&#8217;s <em>Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission </em>decision.</em></p>
<p><em>The &#8220;<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0610/38500.html">Shotgun   Sellout</a>&#8221; exempts large organizations from the most burdensome   regulations of the DISCLOSE Act, &#8220;Democratic Incumbents Seek to Contain   Losses by Outlawing Speech in Elections,&#8221; while pistol whipping genuine   grassroots groups.</em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;The Democratic majority has decided that established, powerful  interest  groups should be exempted from the proposed draconian  regulations,  while small advocacy groups should have their voices  silenced by the  DISCLOSE Act,&#8221; said Center for Competitive Politics  President Sean  Parnell. &#8220;Exempting the National Rifle Association from  these  regulations while local groups such as the Oregon Firearms  Federation  would face stifling regulations if they choose to exercise  their First  Amendment rights simply cannot be considered ‘reform.&#8217;&#8221;</em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;This sort of special carve out for an established interest group  is  just the kind of insider manipulation that gives the public the  sense  that Congress is unresponsive to the concerns of ordinary  Americans,&#8221;  said Allison Hayward, CCP&#8217;s Vice President of Policy. &#8220;How  can it be  that invasive and onerous disclosure requirements are proper  when  applied to small, regional interest groups but not large, wealthy   national groups?&#8221;</em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;This exception could serve to entrench political organization,   discourage local participation in civic groups, and undermine the civic   involvement that Alexis de Tocqueville identified as uniquely American   and one of America&#8217;s great strengths,&#8221; she added.</em></p>
<p><em>According to Capitol Hill sources, the Rules Committee will likely  hold a  Wednesday hearing to advance the DISCLOSE Act to the House  floor by the  end of the week.</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.campaignfreedom.org/newsroom/detail/shotgun-sellout-house-democrats-cut-special-deal-with-nra">Read  the rest here.</a><em><br />
</em></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.ammoseek.com/06152010/the-nra-makes-a-deal-with-the-devil/27/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guns Save Lives, Part XXXIVXX</title>
		<link>http://blog.ammoseek.com/06102010/guns-save-lives-part-xxxivxx/24</link>
		<comments>http://blog.ammoseek.com/06102010/guns-save-lives-part-xxxivxx/24#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 04:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Gallagher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2nd Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cato]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guns save lives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self Defense]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ammoseek.com/?p=24</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Cato: John Lee still has his life and four children still have a father because Mr. Lee had a handgun when three criminals tried to kill him and take his money. Is this another sign that public sentiment moving toward the side of gun rights and away from gun control? We hope so.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/2010/06/09/guns-save-lives-part-xxxivxx/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Cato-at-liberty+%28Cato+at+Liberty%29">From Cato</a>:</p>
<p>John Lee still has his life and four children still have a father  because Mr. Lee had a handgun when three criminals tried to kill him  and take his money.</p>
<p><object width="500" height="400"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/7wmy0Wybcd0&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed  src="http://www.youtube.com/v/7wmy0Wybcd0&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="500" height="400" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>Is this another sign that public sentiment moving toward the side of gun rights and away from gun control? We hope so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.ammoseek.com/06102010/guns-save-lives-part-xxxivxx/24/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John Lott, Ilya Shapiro talk Heller and Gun Ban case with Judge Napolitano</title>
		<link>http://blog.ammoseek.com/03082010/john-lott-ilya-shapiro-talk-heller-and-gun-ban-case-with-judge-napolitano/21</link>
		<comments>http://blog.ammoseek.com/03082010/john-lott-ilya-shapiro-talk-heller-and-gun-ban-case-with-judge-napolitano/21#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 03:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Gallagher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2nd Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john lott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge napolitano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mcdonald case]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ammoseek.com/?p=21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week Fox News&#8217; Judge Andrew Napolitano welcomed guests John Lott and Ilya Shapiro to discuss the McDonald &#8220;Gun Ban&#8221; Supreme Court case and 2nd Amendment state incorporation. Not surprisingly, all 3 guests agree that the 2nd Amendment should apply to the states. The expectation among the experts is that the Supreme Court will rule [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week Fox News&#8217; Judge Andrew Napolitano welcomed guests John Lott and Ilya Shapiro to discuss the McDonald &#8220;Gun Ban&#8221; Supreme Court case and 2nd Amendment state incorporation. Not surprisingly, all 3 guests agree that the 2nd Amendment should apply to the states.</p>
<p>The expectation among the experts is that the Supreme Court will rule in favor of 2nd Amendment incorporation when they release the opinion sometime this summer (June or July).</p>
<p><a href="http://freedomwatchonfox.com/2010/03/02/03022010-freedom-watch-88-w-john-lott-ilya-shapiro-eric-boiling-walter-williams/101372/">Watch the video here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.ammoseek.com/03082010/john-lott-ilya-shapiro-talk-heller-and-gun-ban-case-with-judge-napolitano/21/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interesting read on the NRA&#8217;s role in Supreme Court Chicago gun case</title>
		<link>http://blog.ammoseek.com/01282010/interesting-read-on-the-nras-role-in-supreme-court-chicago-gun-case/9</link>
		<comments>http://blog.ammoseek.com/01282010/interesting-read-on-the-nras-role-in-supreme-court-chicago-gun-case/9#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 06:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Gallagher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2nd Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ammoseek.com/?p=9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Cato Institute&#8217;s Ilya Shapiro has some interesting words about the NRA&#8217;s role in the Chicago gun ban case that is going to be heard by the United States Supreme Court on March 2nd later this year. Sadly, it’s also typical of how the NRA has behaved throughout this case and before that during the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Cato Institute&#8217;s Ilya Shapiro has some interesting words about the NRA&#8217;s role in the Chicago gun ban case that is going to be heard by the United States Supreme Court on March 2nd later this year.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Sadly, it’s also typical of how the NRA has behaved throughout this case  and before that during the <em>Heller</em></em> litigation — sabotaging Alan [Gura] at every turn and showing again and again that, even in the face of  winning arguments that fully support its legal positions, the NRA  prefers to seek glory for itself rather than presenting the strongest  case for its purported constituency of gun owners.</p></blockquote>
<p><a title="NRA Cares More about  NRA than Gun Rights" href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/2010/01/26/nra-cares-more-about-nra-than-gun-rights-liberty-professional-courtesy/" target="_self">Read the full article at Cato.org.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.ammoseek.com/01282010/interesting-read-on-the-nras-role-in-supreme-court-chicago-gun-case/9/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chicago gun ban Supreme Court case discussed on Freedom Watch</title>
		<link>http://blog.ammoseek.com/01212010/chicago-gun-ban-supreme-court-case-discussed-on-freedom-watch/8</link>
		<comments>http://blog.ammoseek.com/01212010/chicago-gun-ban-supreme-court-case-discussed-on-freedom-watch/8#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 04:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Gallagher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2nd Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun bans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ammoseek.com/?p=8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this week the upcoming landmark Supreme Court case to decide if the 2nd Amendment applies to the states was discussed on Judge Andrew Napolitano&#8217;s Freedom Watch show. Check it out below.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this week the upcoming landmark Supreme Court case to decide if the 2nd Amendment applies to the states was discussed on <a href="http://freedomwatchonfox.com/">Judge Andrew Napolitano&#8217;s Freedom Watch</a> show. Check it out below.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" src="http://video.foxnews.com/v/embed.js?id=3974573&#038;w=400&#038;h=249"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.ammoseek.com/01212010/chicago-gun-ban-supreme-court-case-discussed-on-freedom-watch/8/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

